Skip to content

Unit 20: C Preprocessor: Constants and Macros

Learning Objectives

After this unit, students should:

  • understand how the preprocessing step in the compilation pipeline works
  • understand how #include statements work
  • understand why we should avoid hard-coding magic constants and start having the habit of using #define to define constants in their code.
  • understand how #define can be used to define macros
  • be able to explain the differences between macros and functions
  • be able to write macros in a way that avoid the common pitfalls

Revisiting C Compilation Process

In this unit, we are going to delve deeper into the C compilation process, focusing on a step called pre-processing. This step is usually the first step in the compilation process. In the first lecture, we lumped this process under compile (etc) in the figure below.

compile

We can now separate one of the steps under "etc" as the pre-processing step,

compile

Preprocessing

Preprocessing is, in essence, a text processing and substitution process, and so it is not specific to C. In C, this process is used to implement, among other things: (i) file inclusion, (ii) macro, and (iii) conditional compilation.

A C pre-processor processes all the lines in the input file that starts with a # character. Any line that starts with # is a preprocessor directive. You have seen two of such directives, #include to include a file, and #define to define a constant.

#include

The #include directive has the format

1
#include <filename>
or

1
#include "filename"

When the C pre-processor sees this directive, it reads the file specified by the given filename, and inserts the text, line-by-line, from this file, into the current file, in the location where the line #include occurs. Any C preprocessor directive in the included file is recursively processed.

#define Constant

We have seen how we can use #define to define constant values in our code in our exercises and assignments. For instance, in Exercise 2, rectangle.c, you have seen:

1
2
3
4
5
6
#define TOP_LEFT "╔"
#define TOP_RIGHT "╗"
#define BOTTOM_RIGHT "╝"
#define BOTTOM_LEFT "╚"
#define HORIZONTAL "═"
#define VERTICAL "║"

What is the advantage of using TOP_LEFT (which is 8 characters) instead of just one character ╔?

It is a good programming practice to avoid hardcoding constant values (also called magic constants) in our code so that our code can be easily changed when the requirement of our program has changed. Defining these constants as #define allows us to easily modify our program. For instance, suppose that we wish to change the way we draw the rectangle. Instead of

1
2
3
4
5
6
╔════════╗
║        ║
║        ║
║        ║
║        ║
╚════════╝

We wish to draw it like this: 

1
2
3
4
5
6
+--------+
|        |
|        |
|        |
|        |
+--------+

All we have to do, is to change the defined constants: 

1
2
3
4
5
6
#define TOP_LEFT "+"
#define TOP_RIGHT "+"
#define BOTTOM_RIGHT "+"
#define BOTTOM_LEFT "+"
#define HORIZONTAL "-"
#define VERTICAL "|"

We do not have to make any change to the code to draw the rectangles! This reduces the chances that you introduce bugs into the code. See the Appendix for the code.

Let's consider the second example, taxi.c from Assignment 1:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
double metered_fare(long distance)
{
    double fare = 3.20;

    // The first 1 km or less
    if (distance <= 1000) {
        return fare;
    }

    distance -= 1000;
    if (distance <= 9000) {
        fare += 0.22 * lceil(distance,  400);
        return fare;
    }
    // more than 10km
    // 0.22 * ceil(9000 / 400) = 0.22*23 = 5.06
    fare += 5.06;

    distance -= 9000;
    fare += 0.22 * lceil(distance,  350);

    return fare;
}

In the snippet above, there are many hard coded values. Suppose one day, the taxi fare changes (and that day will come). Perhaps the base fare is more, perhaps the distance threshold is shorter. We will have to change the code above to calculate the new fare. By littering the code above with hardcoded values, the code is difficult and error-prone to change.

You might think that we can just search and replace to update the code when the fare changes. But this is error-prone as well! Suppose that the taxi fare increases to $0.25 per 350m after 10km, but remains $0.22 between 1 - 10km, then we cannot just replace every occurrence of 0.22 with 0.25.

We can make our code "future-ready" by abstracting out all the magic numbers and define constants for each of them.

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
#define BASE_FARE 3.20
#define BASE_DISTANCE 1000
#define TIER_ONE_FARE 0.22
#define TIER_ONE_DISTANCE 400
#define TIER_ONE_LIMIT 10000
#define TIER_TWO_FARE 0.22
#define TIER_TWO_DISTANCE 350

double metered_fare(long distance)
{
  double fare = BASE_FARE;

  distance -= BASE_DISTANCE;
  if (distance <= 0) {
    return fare;
  }

  if (distance <= TIER_ONE_LIMIT) {
    fare += TIER_ONE_FARE * lceil(distance,  TIER_ONE_DISTANCE);
  } else {
    fare += TIER_ONE_FARE * (TIER_ONE_LIMIT / TIER_ONE_DISTANCE);
  }

  distance -= TIER_ONE_LIMIT;
  if (distance <= 0) {
    return fare;
  }

  fare += TIER_TWO_FARE * lceil(distance, TIER_TWO_DISTANCE);

  return fare;
}

Replacing the magic numbers with constants make the code a bit harder to read, but now, it is super easy to change. Suppose, one day, the base taxi fare is increased to $3.40, and then $0.20 per 500m subsequently up to 10km, and $0.15 per 600m thereafter, we only need to change:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
#define BASE_FARE 3.40
#define BASE_DISTANCE 1000
#define TIER_ONE_FARE 0.20
#define TIER_ONE_DISTANCE 500
#define TIER_ONE_LIMIT 10000
#define TIER_TWO_FARE 0.15
#define TIER_TWO_DISTANCE 600

The logic of the code remains the same.

How does the C pre-processor process the #define directive? When we write a #define directive, the directive should be followed by an identifier and a token. The token may contain space but must be terminated by a newline. In the example above, BASE_FARE is the identifier, and 3.40 is the token.

When the C pre-processor sees the #define directive, it replaces all instances of the identifier in the file with the token. This is merely a text substitution operation.

The #include Directive

Another commonly used directive is #include. You have seen how we used this to "import" the cs1010.h, stdbool.h, math.h, etc. When we introduced this at the beginning of the lecture, we compared this to the import require, use commands seen in other programming languages. But the mechanism for #include is very different from the others.

The #include directive merely performs text substitution -- it recursively read the lines from the included file, and insert it into the location where the #include directive is.

Consider the example below. Suppose we have three files:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
/**
 * @file: a.c
 */

#include "b.h"

int main()
{
  foo(PI);
}

1
2
3
4
5
6
/**
 * @file: b.h
 */

#include "c.h"
#define PI 3.1415926

1
2
3
4
5
/**
 * @file: c.h
 */

void foo(double x);

Let's see what happens when we run C pre-processor on the file a.c. We can ask clang to stop the compilation process after the pre-processing phase, using the flag -E1.

1
clang -E a.c

The command will produce the output after C pre-processing:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
# 1 "a.c"
# 1 "<built-in>" 1
# 1 "<built-in>" 3
# 360 "<built-in>" 3
# 1 "<command line>" 1
# 1 "<built-in>" 2
# 1 "a.c" 2
# 1 "./b.h" 1
# 1 "./c.h" 1
void foo(double x);
# 6 "./b.h" 2
# 5 "a.c" 2
int main()
{
  foo(3.1415926);
}

The lines start with # are metadata meant for the compiler. If we ignore those, we can see that the file a.c has been expanded into 

1
2
3
4
5
void foo(double x);
int main()
{
  foo(3.1415926);
}

Line 1 above is included from file c.h, which in turn is included from file b.h. The C pre-processor also substitutes the text PI with the text 3.1415926, as the identifier PI is defined in b.h.

In C, we usually use #include to share common function declarations and constants.

#define Macro

The #define directive can be used for a more flexible and powerful text substitution feature called macro. A macro is a block of code that is given an identifying name and is substituted and expanded during pre-processing.

For instance, we can write the following:

1
#define SQUARE(x) x*x

This macro is named SQUARE, just like a function we defined in Lecture 3 and it takes in a parameter x as well. But that's where the similarity ends. There are a few important differences between macros and functions in C:

  • Macros are not called. They are only substituted during the preprocessing phase which performs text processing on the source code.
  • Macros have no information about types. It has no return type and the parameters have no type.

Take the example below. The file:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
#define SQUARE(x) x*x
#define PI 3.1415926
int main()
{
  double radius = 4.0;
  cs1010_print_double(PI*SQUARE(radius));
}

Get expanded into:

1
2
3
4
5
int main()
{
  double radius = 4.0;
  cs1010_print_double(3.1415926*radius*radius);
}

Let's look at another example. We have seen how to write a function that swaps two of the value of variables. The one we wrote swaps two double. If we want to swap two long, or two char *, etc, we will need to write a new function for each one.

Let's write a generic macro that does swapping for any type.

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
#define SWAP(T, x, y) {\
  T temp;\
  temp = x;\
  x = y;\
  y = temp;\
}

int main()
{
  long x = 3.0;
  long y = -1.0;
  SWAP(long, x, y);
}

The macro SWAP takes in three parameters, the first is the type T, the second and the third are the variables to be swapped. This macro definition spans multiple lines. Since C preprocessor ends the definition of a macro with the end of the line, we add a backslash character to "escape" the newline, telling the preprocessor not to treat the newline as the end of the macro definition.

The code above gets expanded to:

1
2
3
4
5
6
int main()
{
  long x = 3.0;
  long y = -1.0;
  { long temp; temp = x; x = y; y = temp;};
}

You might be bothered by the appearance of { and } on Line 5. But note that this is perfectly valid syntax. Recall that we said { and } defines a block, while we commonly define a block in the context of a function body, if, else, for, etc. We can define a block anywhere in C. The reason why it is necessary to place the substituted text within a block is left as an exercise (Problem 20.2).

Pitfalls and Best Practices

It is easy to forget that macro is doing simple text substitution without an understanding of C syntax. When we write macros, we should always guard against improper usage of macros. Let's consider this:

1
#define SQUARE(x) x*x

1
SQUARE(radius + 2)

When the pre-processor substitutes the macro SQUARE, it replaces all instances of the text x with the text radius + 2. After substitution, we get radius + 2*radius + 2! This is not what we expected.

To prevent such unexpected expansion, we should always add parenthesis to our macro expression:

1
#define SQUARE(x) ((x)*(x))

So now, 

1
SQUARE(radius + 2)

gets expanded into ((radius + 2)*(radius + 2)), which is what we would expect when we call SQUARE.

To help the readers of your code know that you are referencing a macro rather than a function, all macros should be written with uppercase letters.

Problem Set 20

Problem 20.1

a) Consider the macro below:

1
2
3
4
#define MIN(a,b)  a < b ? a : b

long i = MIN(10, 20);
long j = MIN(10, 20) + 1;

What are the values for i and j after executing the above?

b)

CS1010-trained students should know better than to use the ++ operator, which combines two steps into one and has the side effects on value i. Let's say someone who is not trained this way wrote the following code:

1
2
3
4
5
#define MIN(a,b)  a < b ? a : b

long i = 10;
long j = 20;
long k = MIN(j, i++);

What are the values of i and k after executing the above? Explain what happen.

Problem 20.2

Suppose we write our SWAP macro without the opening and closing brackets:

1
2
3
#define SWAP(T, x, y) T temp = x;\
  x = y;\
  y = temp;

CS1010-trained students should know better than to write if-else block without { and }. Suppose someone writes an if-else block without { and }. What could go wrong if they use the macro above, also without the opening and closing brackets?

Appendix A

The three functions to solve Rectangle in Exercise 2.

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
void draw_top_line(long width)
{
  cs1010_print_string(TOP_LEFT);
  for (int j = 0; j < width - 2; j += 1) {
    cs1010_print_string(HORIZONTAL);
  }
  cs1010_println_string(TOP_RIGHT);
}

void draw_bottom_line(long width)
{
  cs1010_print_string(BOTTOM_LEFT);
  for (int j = 0; j < width - 2; j += 1) {
    cs1010_print_string(HORIZONTAL);
  }
  cs1010_println_string(BOTTOM_RIGHT);
}

void draw_rectangle(long width, long height)
{
  draw_top_line(width);
  for (int i = 0; i < height - 2; i += 1) {
    cs1010_print_string(VERTICAL);
    for (int j = 0; j < width - 2; j += 1) {
      cs1010_print_string(" ");
    }
    cs1010_println_string(VERTICAL);
  }
  draw_bottom_line(width);
}

  1. You can also run the C pre-processor directly by invoking the command cpp. ↩